#OPEN OFFICE VERSUS NEOOFFICE FOR MAC OS X#
#OPEN OFFICE VERSUS NEOOFFICE MAC OS X#

NeoOffice used a subclause of 's license to change it to another license which is incompatible with the core project. It is built on top of X11 by using Java/Cocoa bindings for the User Interface (UI).

#OPEN OFFICE VERSUS NEOOFFICE MAC OS X#

This means, for example, native access to all the fonts in Mac OS X a different way than does ( does use all Apple fonts, but not the same way). Using Java/Cocoa binding, its look is like native integration with the Mac OS X system. The NeoOffice project does not contribute back to and usually does not help to enhance the core project.

#OPEN OFFICE VERSUS NEOOFFICE FOR MAC OS X#

NeoOffice is a fork of the core project, which specialized in making it available for Mac OS X independently from 's Aqua port mentioned above.ДЇork meaning that NeoOffice is another project, and is not. Since version 3.0 of was released Mac Aqua is another primary platform of the core project.

Aqua is the core project with native support for Mac Aqua. The core project aims to be as generally useful as possible, so the need of forks is reduced. Since specialized needs of these forks are sometimes not directly applicable to the core project and the effort needed to integrate their changes into such a complex multi-platform, multi-language office suite require valuable development and testing resources there will always be the temporary need for specialized branches of the core project. Some just take and never give back and instead threaten with lawsuits if the core project touches their niche market. Some projects just replace the branding and sell it as their product. Some projects contribute by writing good bug reports to get the upstream developers involved.

Some projects contribute developer power for isolating problems. Some of the projects contribute all their changes back. They all have in common that they take the new features, improvements, and the many bugfixes from the core project and extend it to their needs. There are different kinds of collaboration between the projects. and not contributing anything back into the project. The original license even allowed taking all the code, documentation, templates, etc. Users and many organizations benefit from the power and the generous license of the project.

org part of the project name, which is needed for legal reasons. is the name of productivity application suite, the project and the website.

8 Q5: But it would be more efficient, if there would be only one effort.

7 Q4: It's OpenSource, so one project should freely use the other projects code.

6 Q3: Where do I get support for Mac/AquaВ ?.

5 Q2: Why does there seem to be several parallel efforts?.

Open office versus neooffice